Search for: "State v. Velasquez" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
  Here, in Terio v Spodek ;  2009 NY Slip Op 04412 Decided on June 2, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  we see how that might happen:   "To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909; Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380; Volpe v Canfield,… [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Palencia v Perez, 2019 WL 1907867 (11th Cir., 2019) the district court concluded that Marilys Velasquez Perez had wrongfully retained her son, H.J.D.V., in the United States and away from Guatemala, his place of habitual residence. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:58 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 105 provides that When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the court, upon... [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:34 am by Jon Sands
" Bea wanted more specific objections.Congrats to AFPDs Dan Kaplan and Sarah Stone, Arizona FPD (Phoenix).Velasquez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:19 pm
The California Court of Appeal agreed with my opinion of class-action lawsuits in the recent decision, Starbucks v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011), summarizes general Texas immunity law: Under Texas law, a suit against a government employee in his official capacity is a suit against his government employer with one exception: an action alleging that the employee acted ultra vires. [read post]