Search for: "State v. Velasquez"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011), summarizes general Texas immunity law: Under Texas law, a suit against a government employee in his official capacity is a suit against his government employer with one exception: an action alleging that the employee acted ultra vires. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
Helpful Links Leymis Velasquez, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
’” State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
” Velasquez-Canales Slip op. at 6. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am
” In re Marriage of Velasquez, 692 NE 2d 841 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1998 After a divorce with a complete and comprehensive division of assets and debts…what else could a couple go back to court for? [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In Alvarez v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm
(v) Their needs in terms of locality to maintain employment and or family support. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
However, the ECtHR (Bevacqua and S v Bulgaria and Opuz v Turkey) and the CEDAW Committee (Yildirim v Austria; Goekce v Austria) have recognised that the right to privacy is also a positive obligation to secure the private realm so that individuals may flourish. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am
" The standard under Franks v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
Miranda v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
” Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:17 am
Last year, in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:31 am
The commission found that in one case, City of Moreno Valley v. [read post]
