Search for: "State v. Via" Results 1 - 20 of 11,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2019, 10:15 am by Derek Handova
Supreme Court invited the United States Solicitor General to file a brief expressing its views in the long-running case of Google LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:55 pm by Immigration Prof
Guest blogger: Victor Ng, second-year law student, University of San Francisco On Monday, April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:12 pm by Darren Olivier
SABC, a state owned company, contented that the decisions do not constitute administrative decisions but contractual ones under their agreement with Via. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:47 pm by Tate Brown
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference the case of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:59 am
Roger Parloff at Fortune now has -- not making this up -- a seven-part series on the affair, and it looks eminently worth reading (via YallPolitics).... [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:32 am by Bruce Carton
Via The Volokh Conspiracy, I learned of an interesting Fourth Amendment decision by a federal court in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Wells Bennett
We interrupt the week’s Snowden-related coverage with this tiny reminder: at 9 a.m. tomorrow, hearings resume in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 10:15 am by Derek Handova
Supreme Court invited the United States Solicitor General to file a brief expressing its views in the long-running case of Google LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 9:13 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court yesterday granted certiorari in Harris v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm by Anna Christensen
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm by Jason Mazzone
The oral argument this past Wednesday in United States v. [read post]