Search for: "State v. Villalon" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2014, 5:22 am by Jani
Villalon proposed that "[t]he non-exhaustive character of the list in Article 6(2) of the Directive implies that the exclusion of a parthenote from the concept of human embryo contained in Article 6(2)(c) of the Directive, does not prevent a Member State from excluding parthenotes from patentability based on Article 6(1) of the Directive".Mr. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
He observed that: "It is common ground [see paras 48 to 51 of the judgment of Arnold J in EMI v BSkyB] that if they are targeted at the UK then infringement of UK copyright has been committed by the first defendant. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
 This would be because this piece of EU legislation does not allow Member States to allocate a portion of the fair compensation to the publishers if there is no obligation for the publishers to ensure that they pass on this part, directly or indirectly, to the authors.In its analysis the ECS endorsed the AG Opinion on this point, and submitted that the CJEU should (re-)affirm the author principle, ie initial ownership of copyright for authors. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
 Following his Opinion earlier today in Pez Hejduk [here], AG Cruz Villalón has in fact just issued another one [once again, available in - amongst others - Italian but not English], this being the much-awaited Opinion in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Dutch Supreme Court seeking clarification as to the following:1. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:40 am
This morning Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion in Case C‑583/12 Sintax Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a request to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus, Estonia. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:42 am by Jani
ISCC's patents cover the use of cells in a state where they cannot possibly be fertilized and multiply, thus not, under the Court's current considerations, be classified as a 'human ebryo', and be exempt from patenting. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:48 am by Matthew Hunter
(v) Authorities should be required to notify individuals of the access, at least after the event when there is no risk that the purpose for accessing the data would be compromised. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
’Advocate General Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalon advised the CJEU to answer all these questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered – and to the courts of the Member… [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:26 am
    If the reply to this question is in the negative, what are the relevant and consistent criteria that the Member States must apply in order to ensure that, in accordance with European Union law, the compensation may be regarded as fair and that a fair balance is maintained between the persons concerned? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
Today the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which it held that #freesherlock is the answer to the fascinating copyright saga that has kept Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson's fans in an almost unbearable state of suspense for some time.Writing on behalf of the Court, Circuit Judge Richard Posner [who - this Kat is told - is known as a huge cat lover] nicely summarised what this… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
523/10 Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH -- dispute on which the Court of Justice of the European Union was asked for guidance by the Oberster Gerichtshof, Austria. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
The images are another matter.In Deckmyn, AG Cruz Villalon referred to "burlesque intention" as a requirement of parody. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs. [read post]