Search for: "State v. Wallace"
Results 741 - 760
of 998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 8:05 am
See Wallace v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
This ILB entry from Feb. 26, 2010 included quotes from a story by Jeff Neumeyer, posted Feb. 25th on the... [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:09 pm
Soost expands the law on Wallace damages, and states that Wallace damages can also be awarded for other objectively provable losses, foreseeable by both parties at the time of entering into the employment contract, such as the loss of a book of business, if such losses arise from the unfair and insensitive conduct of the employer at the time of termination.Soost is referenced in Elgert v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
See Wallace v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
Wallace, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
In Fore v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
Gregory Wallace, Justifying Religious Freedom: The Western Tradition, 114 Penn State Law Review 485-570 (2009).Shannon Gilreath, Not a Moral Issue: Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty (Reviewing Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty, edited by Douglas Laycock, Anthony R. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Wenner, 351 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2003) (burglary is not a crime of violence); id. at 977 (Wallace, J., dissenting) (is too); United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
(Note that, to my knowledge, the Cato Institute filed no amicus brief in Kansas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:13 am
Case: Lum v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Hood, was convicted in 1990 in the fatal shootings of Ronald Williamson and Tracie Lynn Wallace, a couple he lived with in Plano, Tex. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
" As I wrote back then:I can think of only two possible explanations for this odd and surprising move by the court: Either the CCA egregiously erred last spring by failing to accommodate Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
However the court refused to dismiss his Free Exercise claim for damages because it read recent 7th Circuit precedent as requiring the state to show that it was using the least restrictive means when prison rules impose a substantial burden on religious practice.In Wallace v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:13 pm
The ILB has two entries today that referenced the Supreme Court's April 2009 decision in Wallace v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
I don’t think this works under Smith v. [read post]
