Search for: "State v. Wardwell" Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am by Dan Bressler
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434). [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On the record before us, plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for legal malpractice. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that they would have succeeded in the underlying personal injury action "but for" defendants' conduct (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434, 866 N.E.2d 1033, 834 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2007]). [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Walker (The Ohio State University), on Friday, December 3, 2021 Tags: Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Statement by Chair Gensler on Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These principles apply to allegations of legal malpractice (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]; Snyder v Brown Chiari, LLP, 116 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2014]; Alaimo v McGeorge, 69 AD3d 1032, 1034 [2010]). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a result of the lack of senior partner attention, G.K. in 2007 brought in Davis Polk & Wardwell, which billed more than $7.6 million, the complaint states. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Employee Stock Options and Mergers and Acquisitions Posted by Ilona Babenko, Arizona State University, on Friday, August 12, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Acquisitions, Bidders, Equity-based compensation, Mergers & acquisitions, Stock options,Takeover premiums, Target firms, Tech companies Stakes Go Up In SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Wayne M. [read post]