Search for: "State v. Willis" Results 81 - 100 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Today, small rural states with less diverse populations benefit from state equality in the Senate. [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am by Anna Bower
In a court filing prior to the hearing, Ellis’s legal team had pointed to Georgia Court of Appeals precedent in Kenerly v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In both swing states and safe seats, Republicans say liberals hate them personally and may turn rioters or a police state on people who disobey them. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 1:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new eligibility decision in CareDx, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Professor Willis was one of the first to closely examine law in the administrative state and the role of administrative tribunals, in a pioneering collection published in 1941 (Canadian Boards at Work). [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
About a century ago, Benito Mussolini called fascist Italy a “totalitarian state,” a concept that he defined with brilliant clarity: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:51 pm by Joseph Fishkin
It needs to reach out and show that a different set of constitutional ideas is available for the public to grab hold of, and for Congress and state legislatures and state courts to consider, as we begin to build a future constitutional politics on foundations from the Ninth Amendment to the Thirteenth to the Fourteenth, in response to the Court’s decision in Dobbs.4. [read post]