Search for: "State v. Wood" Results 281 - 300 of 2,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
Those of us in the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar would like an answer too, please. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The court accordingly dismissed the complaint and denied leave to amend (Moniodes v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 11:29 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2009, Scabby and his union owners prevailed in a similar case decided by New Jersey’s Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Reviewed by Michael Woods. __________________ [1] Enbridge Energy Ltd. v State of Michigan, 2020 USDCWDMSD, Case 1:20-cv-01141 ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Online: < https://www.eenews.net/assets/2020/11/25/document_ew_05.pdf> [2] Enbridge Energy LP, supra note 1 at 1. [3] U.S.C. 6 [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]