Search for: "State v. Woodbury"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
While Davis was on the SJC, the court issued advisory opinions on two of the most explosive issues in American politics: Black voting rights after Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Now, in Village of Kiryas Joel, New York v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:10 pm
Citation: Lamoureux v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:06 pm
LostMessiah blog reports:A [New York] state appeals court has upheld the Village of Woodbury’s Comprehensive Plan and zoning laws, reversing a 2014 ruling that branded the zoning “exclusionary” for failing to accommodate the high-density housing needs of the Hasidic residents of neighboring Kiryas Joel.In Matter of Village of Kiryas Joel, N.Y. v Village of Woodbury, N.Y. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
Kiryas Joel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
B. v Monroe-Woodbury Cent. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
United States John G. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:33 am
The high court ruled unanimously in Cyan Inc. et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 11:20 am
Pierce v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
This isn’t quite true, but the example the state cited was Woodbury v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:47 am
Group Corp. v Planning Bd. of Town of Woodbury, N.Y., 20 AD3d 531, 533; Matter of Mackall v White, 85 AD2d 696, 696). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:47 am
Group Corp. v Planning Bd. of Town of Woodbury, N.Y., 20 AD3d 531, 533; Matter of Mackall v White, 85 AD2d 696, 696). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
The dissenting opinion also does not engage the majority opinion’s reliance on a state case called Luse v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 2:08 pm
, 62 Fla. 398, 56 So. 696 (1911); Woodbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Proof an individual must submit to a court to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract and an alleged tortious interference with prospective economic advantageMehrhof v Monroe-Woodbury Cent. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Proof an individual must submit to a court to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract and an alleged tortious interference with prospective economic advantageMehrhof v Monroe-Woodbury Cent. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
