Search for: "State v. Yates" Results 1 - 20 of 371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Yates [2009] EWCA Civ 479; [2009] WLR (D) 184 “A Canadian widow who, on her marriage to a British national in Canada, received a British pension based on her husband's contributions and paid at the rate applicable to the inflation uprating he received, frozen at the time he [...] [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm by Mike Madison
That’s the Supreme Court of the United States, in Yates v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
Day before yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 5, 2014 in the case of Yates v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:27 pm by Ellen Podgor
Co-blogger Solomon Wisenberg's post on today's Supreme Court decision in Yates v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:31 am by tracey
Bridge Trustees Ltd v Yates and others (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening) [2011] UKSC 42;  [2011] WLR (D)  267 “Equilibrium of assets and liabilities was not a requirement of the definition of a money purchase pension scheme under section 181 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993.” WLR Daily, 27th July 2011 Source: [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:27 am by sally
Bridge Trustees Ltd v Yates and others (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 179; [2010] WLR (D) 65 “Where a hybrid occupational pension scheme was being wound up the benefits derived from voluntary contributions made to the scheme by the employee and matched by their employer’s contribution, ranked first in order of priority in the winding up of the scheme.” [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Yesterday, however, Nunes stated that the closed hearing had been canceled as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
United States  is interesting for what it may say about King v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:29 pm by Kali Borkoski
The transcript in Yates v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:35 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Yates v. [read post]