Search for: "State v. York" Results 21 - 40 of 32,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2025, 10:20 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
The New York Times has since reported, however, that the government has invoked a rarely used “foreign policy” ground of deportation. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 6:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ellen’s Stardust, Inc. v Sturm 2025 NY Slip Op 30488(U) February 6, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 651690/2021 is a short and direct decision by Judge: Andrew Borrok In it he merely quotes an interim AD decision about the second amended complaint to demonstrate that a motion against the third amended complaint is unwarranted. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 10:00 pm
It also concluded that “humane euthanasia” was “the most appropriate remedy” under the circumstances and affirmed the outcome in all respects.I don’t know about you, but I’m certainly dog-tired of that.# # #DECISIONThe People of the State of New York v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR 5.3, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service 2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR 5.3, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service 2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 5:45 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Section 12.8 selected the “laws of the Cayman Islands,” and Section 12.14 selected the “United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,” as the governing law and venue for litigation. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So, we're happy to say that on April 29th the Supreme Court will hear Martin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 7:49 am by Staff Attorney
Brijesh Goel & Akshay Niranjan, Civil Action Number 1:22-CV-06282, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings [OATH] reversed the decision of an OATH hearing officer made after a hearing what dismissed charges filed against Plaintiff and:[1] reinstated charges filed against Plaintiff alleging two violations of the Administrative Code of the City of New York; and[2] imposed $50,000 in civil penalties against Plaintiff. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings [OATH] reversed the decision of an OATH hearing officer made after a hearing what dismissed charges filed against Plaintiff and:[1] reinstated charges filed against Plaintiff alleging two violations of the Administrative Code of the City of New York; and[2] imposed $50,000 in civil penalties against Plaintiff. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Jon May
As Professor Dershowitz certainly knows, all the Supreme Court said in Bordenkircher v. [read post]