Search for: "State v. York" Results 81 - 100 of 34,881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:01 pm
One week after a New York court struck down Rockland County's sex offender banishment law (opinion available here), State Senate Majority Leader Malcolm A. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:57 am by Immigration Prof
New York, the challenge to the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people unlawfully in the country from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House.... [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:50 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Sara MyersThis morning, the New York Court of Appeals released an 81-page opinion in Myers v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:08 am
This quote comes from a footnote out of the New York's Court of Appeals, our highest court and the one Chief Judge Kaye sits on, in a case last year (Haywood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
A New York Senate bill, S560-2015, introduced in May by State Senator John A. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 2:44 pm
Thanks to this recent New York Divorce and Family Law Blog post for reporting on the recent New York Appellate Division (intermediate level state appellate court) case of Martinez v. [read post]