Search for: "State v. Young" Results 21 - 40 of 8,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That may be accurate for people who were alive when those laws were still on the books, but how do such past laws influence young people who were born decades after Loving v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Rachel Neave
Proponents of this viewpoint also pointed to the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The seller in the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in Trifecta Multimedia Holdings Inc. and Dave Young v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court did not invalidate a state anti-miscegenation law until 1967 in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The party claiming insurance coverage bears the burden of proving entitlement" (New York State Thruway Auth. v Ketco, Inc., 119 AD3d 659, 661; see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The party claiming insurance coverage bears the burden of proving entitlement" (New York State Thruway Auth. v Ketco, Inc., 119 AD3d 659, 661; see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As John Vile argues in his insightful 2016 book, Convention Wisdom, if state legislators control the convention calls and later ratification of the convention’s proposals, they should definitely not also fill the convention itself: checks and balances are essential within the Article V convention process (p.146). [read post]