Search for: "State v. Zarate" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Valentin Zarate Diaz (“Father”) and Laura Andrea Rios Ibarra (“Mother”) were the parents of Son V, a minor child. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:44 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is hearing oral arguments at 2:30pm today in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am by Quinta Jurecic
Circuit reversed a lower court's judgment this morning in Obama v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
G & G states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm
Aguirre, Beatriz Zarate, Graciela Valles and Taqueria Los Gallos, Inc. of Logansport, Indiana illegally intercepted satellite signals and broadcast the "Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail has printed an apology to the author JK Rowling in which it states that it has paid her substantial damages over an article that claimed she had told a misleading “sob story. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
In Guantanamo news, Ben flagged a post by Marty Lederman over at Just Security noting the Supreme Court’s unusual repeated relisting of a pending Guantánamo habeas appeal in Hussain v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]