Search for: "State v. a Quantity of Copies of Books" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 3:30 am by Annemarie Bridy
HathiTrust involved claims of fair use for digital book-scanning, where the purpose of whole-book scanning was to facilitate (re)search and not to function as a market substitute for copies of the scanned works. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 Perhaps the objectives of Dumb Starbucks and Starbucks do not seem “sharply different” in this context (Blanch v Koons).Could Dumb Starbucks have pursued their marketing objective without copying as much of the Starbucks branding? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
Yet their copyright was not upheld, in the name of the public interest, when they tried to enjoin the reproduction of stills from the film in a history book on the subject in Time Inc. v. [read post]