Search for: "State v. a Quantity of Copies of Books"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 3:30 am
HathiTrust involved claims of fair use for digital book-scanning, where the purpose of whole-book scanning was to facilitate (re)search and not to function as a market substitute for copies of the scanned works. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:20 pm
” Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 6:35 pm
Based on the briefs filed in the Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Perhaps the objectives of Dumb Starbucks and Starbucks do not seem “sharply different” in this context (Blanch v Koons).Could Dumb Starbucks have pursued their marketing objective without copying as much of the Starbucks branding? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
& Appliance v. [read post]
Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation–RBC Bearings v. Caliber
18 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
The opinion isn’t in Westlaw but does appear in Lexis [RBC Bearings Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 9:12 pm
Nursing Home Pension Fund v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:41 am
" [Terry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm
China and Google v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Ent. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Yet their copyright was not upheld, in the name of the public interest, when they tried to enjoin the reproduction of stills from the film in a history book on the subject in Time Inc. v. [read post]