Search for: "Steamship Company v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 3:50 pm by Victoria VanBuren
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that nonsignatories to arbitration agreements may be compelled to arbitrate under the New York Convention. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:36 am by Pierre Bergeron
Thompson is a fugitive from the law, actively pursued by United States Marshalls; and the vast wealth representing the ship’s golden cargo is as lost today as it was before September 1988. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
In 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Hall-Williams v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:07 pm
  Defendants removed the State Court action to federal court, and plaintiffs then filed a maritime action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which plaintiffs sought an attachment on the salvage from the S.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:14 am by Steven Boutwell
The United States Coast Guard named Settoon the strictly liable Responsible Party under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) (codified at 33 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
This document has been electronically entered in the records of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
During a poker game, Roosevelt asked Jackson how he had voted in Southern Steamship Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Portsea Steamship Co Ltd (The Portsmouth).20 While the rule is more or less settled in the UK, there are cases in which the rule was not applied on the particular facts.21 Two commentators have recently reviewed the law in the UK and Australia. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Flynn, (personal jurisdiction present where treatment in Florida waters and there were multiple contacts with state); Elmlund v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Barry Sookman
Anchor Line (Henderson Bros.), [1918] A.C. 837 (H.L.), stated that “if it is found that the company did what was reasonably sufficient to give notice of conditions printed on the back of a ticket, the person taking the ticket would be bound by such conditions”. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
 Software companies look for bugs late in the development process and knowingly package and ship buggy software with impunity. [read post]