Search for: "Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
Bulova Watch Co. that the Lanham Act covered the conduct of a United States citizen who sold in Mexico luxury watches falsely stamped with a U.S. trademark. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am by Minyao Wang
Bulova Watch Co. that the Lanham Act covered a U.S. citizen’s sale of infringing watches in Mexico. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am by Dennis Crouch
Bulova Watch Co., 344 U.S. 280 (1952), which allowed for collection of damages for foreign infringement. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:14 pm by Eileen McDermott
Bulova Watch Co., 344 U.S. 280, 282-285 (1952), but overall seemed to be considering the need for a new or narrowed test to account for the realities of modern commerce. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:14 pm by Eileen McDermott
Bulova Watch Co., 344 U.S. 280, 282-285 (1952), but overall seemed to be considering the need for a new or narrowed test to account for the realities of modern commerce. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:31 am by Louis M. Solomon
Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1956)), following the seminal Supreme Court decision in Steele v. [read post]