Search for: "Steele v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 1,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
  A Ukrainian captain in the besieged Azovstal steel plant has said that he believes all civilians sheltering inside have now been evacuated. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Metinvest also owns the embattled steel plant in Mariupol. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
  RUSSIA, UKRAINE – EVACUATIONS About 200 civilians, including 20 children, remain at the Mariupol steel plant where Ukrainian soldiers have refused Russian demands to surrender, Ukrainian officials have said. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether, under United States Supreme Court precedent including Ruhrgas AG v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Katherine Pompilio
United States metastasized into a massive system restraining the speech of millions. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
And from August 2004 through February 2019, the court did not grant a single petition for cert before judgment (in United States v. [read post]