Search for: "Steelworkers v. Labor Board" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm by Mark Theodore and Joshua Fox
” The waiver standard also undermined grievance arbitration because it encouraged unions to raise contractual disputes before the Board, where it was more apt for a favorable determination, which runs contrary to the policy established by the Supreme Court in the Steelworkers trilogy to resolve contractual disputes in arbitration. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Specifically, The National Labor Relations Act of July 5, 1935 empowered the National Labor Relations Board to prevent any person from engaging in unfair labor practices “affecting commerce. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Even though most components of the Board’s order of remedial relief were enforced, the appeals court denied enforcement of the Board’s bargaining order, explaining that the Board failed to properly account for changed circumstances during the two-year period between the unfair labor practices and its decision, particularly given the significant employee and management turnover and the importance of employees’ free choice (Novelis Corp.… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:55 am by Robert Kreisman
Because of the purchase, Caterpillar assumed the labor contract Bucyrus previously had negotiated with the United Steelworkers Union. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
In San Manuel, the Board adopted a framework, based on principles first enumerated by the Ninth Circuit in Donovan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled eight (8) hearings for the month of November, as listed below. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
  The Board noted that the Respondents' original answers sufficiently deny or deny knowledge of each of the unfair labor practice allegations and that there is no evidence that the Respondents' amended answers were intended to replace their original answers in their entirety or that, as the General Counsel contended, the Respondents intended to withdraw their original answers. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]