Search for: "Steelworkers v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 5:32 am by Joshua Waimberg
At the time, the United Steelworkers of America were seeking a new contract that would increase wages for its members. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
The Court's 1979 decision in United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Collaboration Collapses Less than a year after the announcements of collaboration between China and the United States, on October 15, 2010, the United States Steelworkers filed a petition, under Section 301 of the trade law, containing “allegations relating to a variety of Chinese practices affecting trade and investments in the green technology sector.” [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Collaboration Collapses Less than a year after the announcements of collaboration between China and the United States, on October 15, 2010, the United States Steelworkers filed a petition, under Section 301 of the trade law, containing “allegations relating to a variety of Chinese practices affecting trade and investments in the green technology sector.” [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
United Steelworkers (Ont. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 3:15 am by Lyle Denniston
  And, even if the state’s supreme court ultimately were to uphold Act 1 against the state constitutional challenge, the case of Machinists Union v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
However, after certification of a bargaining unit and a union – the contractual nature fails since “…it is [not] possible to speak of individual contracts of employment and to treat the collective agreement as a mere appendage of individual relationships.”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15]  The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:01 am by Chris Lund
I have no idea if they comply with the United Steelworkers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:10 am by Doorey
Budd, “Strike Replacement Legislation and Collective Bargaining: Lessons for the United States” (1996), 35(2) Industrial Relations 245; M. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]