Search for: "Steinberger v. Steinberger" Results 301 - 320 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Filing an administrative appeal challenging an adverse personnel decision does not toll the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuitSteinberg v Board of Educ. of the City School Dist. of the City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 00201, Decided on January 12, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentMatthew Steinberg challenged his termination during his probationary period from his teaching [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in Guzzello v Steinberg, Finneo, Berger, Barone & Fischoff, P.C. ;2009 NY Slip Op 09427 ; Decided on December 15, 2009 ;Appellate Division, Second Department  we see one additional element added in. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
Earlier coverage begins with this post; more on Laurence Steinberg, here. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm by Ray Dowd
EizenstatGagosian Gallery, 980 Madison Ave., at 77th Street5:30 - 7:30 PMRECEPTION SPONSOR: Gagosian GalleryAward Chairs: Olivera Medenica; Carol Steinberg and Nancy WolffFaculty in formation: Christopher Alfieri, Christovich & Kearney, LLP, Director, Biennial, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Sachs, Bill Sjostrom, Marc Steinberg, Ahmed Taha, Steven Thel, Randall Thomas, and Manning Warren. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Sachs, Bill Sjostrom, Marc Steinberg, Ahmed Taha, Steven Thel, Randall Thomas, and Manning Warren.) [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
For similar reasons, the facts of the instant case can also be distinguished from those in Steinberg v Hermitage Ins. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
I submitted to the SEC yesterday a comment letter on behalf of  a bi-partisan group of eighty professors of law, business, economics, or finance in favor of facilitating shareholder director nominations. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:54 pm
Finding Defendant "May Have" Caused the Deletion of "Possibly Relevant Emails," Court Orders Sanctions, Including Payment to Local Bar Association - David Bowerman of K&L Gates on the firm's Electronic Discovery Law blog Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:13 pm
Class Action Counsel Obtained Significant Benefit through Class Action Settlement Following 10-Year Litigation but Requested Multiplier was Excessive given Billing Rates of Class Counsel, Warranting Multiplier of 1.5 rather than 1.79 as Requested New York Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action in New York state court against his automobile insurance company following its payment of insurance benefits that allegedly “did not reflect the amount that plaintiff, the insurance adjuster… [read post]