Search for: "Steinberger v. Steinberger" Results 141 - 160 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Sachs, Bill Sjostrom, Marc Steinberg, Ahmed Taha, Steven Thel, Randall Thomas, and Manning Warren.) [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:27 pm by Chris Castle
 (For those reading along at home, Wixen is represented by badass David Steinberg, so good luck Pandora.) [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Minnesota, Birchfield v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MEI thereafter retained the defendant attorney Heath Berger and his firm, the defendant Steinberg, Fineo, Berger & Fischoff, P.C., formerly known as Steinberg, Fineo, Berger & Barone, P.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:08 pm by By Adam Wahlberg
Two years after getting his J.D. he became counsel to Senate President Mickey Steinberg. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
 And coverage of the decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s decision in Luna Torres v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Origins of the Doctrine The original and leading case in New York on shareholder derivative plaintiff conflicts of interest is Steinberg v Steinberg (106 Misc 2d 720 [Sup Ct, NY County 1980]), in which the Court ruled that a derivative plaintiff must “demonstrate that she will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the shareholders and the corporation, and that she is free of adverse personal interest or animus. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:32 am
Steinberg, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Instrument Sufficiently Alleged Defendant Failed to Pay Subway Fare by 'Doubling Up' People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in Guzzello v Steinberg, Finneo, Berger, Barone & Fischoff, P.C. ;2009 NY Slip Op 09427 ; Decided on December 15, 2009 ;Appellate Division, Second Department  we see one additional element added in. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:57 am
DuPont loses post-trial motions in medical monitoring and property damage class action - Charleston lawyer Jeffrey V. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:17 pm
” The argument against Breyer — one of two Jewish justices on the Court (the other is Ruth Bader Ginsburg) — is that he wrote the majority opinion in Steinberg v. [read post]