Search for: "Steiner v. City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 1:02 am
Court of Appeals in New York City has held (Steiner v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:31 am
Lauderdale and Camden, Maine, and a luxury apartment in New York City. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:45 pm
" Now that the firm has a better understanding of its staffing needs, and is in the process of consolidating multiple offices in the same cities (e.g., New York), it is reducing staff redundancies. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
Thompson, an off-duty New York City police officer. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
Rather than submit a no-action petition and ask the SEC to reconsider its Hain Celestial precedent, Apache decided to sue Chevedden in federal court in Houston, the energy company's hometown, where it had previously prevailed in a 2008 lawsuit with New York City's pension funds. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:50 am
City of New York , 832 F.3d 120, 124 (2d Cir. 2016). [6] See, e.g. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Judges Don't Get Raises
New York Law Journal
New York Chief Judge Judith S. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
EuropeKJE947 .S745 2009EU law / Josephine Steiner and Lorna Woods.Steiner, Josephine.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2009. [read post]
