Search for: "Stephen E. Sachs" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
Kress (University of Michigan), on Tuesday, September 17, 2019 Tags: Bank Holding Company Act, Banks, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Mergers & acquisitions, Systemic risk Trends in Executive Compensation Posted by Michael Kesner, Ed Sim, and Tara Tays, Deloitte Consulting LLP, on Tuesday, September 17, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, CFOs, Compensation committees, Compensation… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am by Bridget Crawford
Hatcher PovertyLawProf Baltimore       Will Hubbard ProfHubbard Baltimore       Margaret E. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:30 am by Christopher W. Schmidt
In the former category are Bernadette Meyler’s powerful critique of the Supreme Court’s reading of the history of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause; Saul Cornell’s challenge to originalists to meet the standards of a“genuinely historical approach to reading Founding Era texts that draws on the best interdisciplinary methods available”;1 William Baude and Stephen E. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Casto’s article The Erie Doctrine and the Structure of Constitutional Revolutions is cited in the following article: Stephen E. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by Stephen Sachs
" It's only because "[w]e have come to see that even the fundamental principles of the common law were 'made' by judges" that "the 'natural' limits of pre-modern common law disappear, and the potential for making common law becomes as broad as we are willing to let judges go. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by karen shephard
University of Georgie School of Law – Stephen Sachs, Professor of Law, Duke Law, presents today as part of the Faculty Colloquium Series. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:04 am by Howard Bashman
“Grounding Originalism”: Law professors William Baude and Stephen E. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
If what I have argued in my book is correct, then I would think these originalists would either have to explain why their particular understanding of constitutional text and fixity automatically inhered in the Constitution from the start (regardless of what practices or assumptions initially surrounded it) or they would have to offer a new set of justifications explaining why the Constitution today should be treated as a particular kind of object with a particular set of attributes even if, in fact,… [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 5:56 pm by Guest Blogger
”   Third, Will Baude and Stephen Sachs’s positivist defenses of originalism rely at times on historical claims about what courts do. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Howard Bashman
“Brooding Omnipresence”: Law professor Stephen E. [read post]