Search for: "Stephen Gillers"
Results 181 - 198
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
The article quotes New York University law professor Stephen Gillers, an expert on legal ethics, as saying that lawyers who draft pleadings and briefs for other lawyers don't violate the ethics rules, since the filing attorney takes responsibility for the work. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:32 pm
According to NYU legal ethics guru Stephen Gillers, these days, Weil may wear both hats for Lee so long as the individual lawyers who worked on the Refco deal don't also act as Lee's trial counsel in the suit against Mayer Brown. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 7:48 am
Stephen Gillers, an NYU Law ethics professor, tells Business Week that the job of in-house attorney is “the most ethically challenged position in the American legal profession. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:16 pm
"He does have an argument," said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at NYU. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:01 pm
PLEASE SAVE THE DATE LAWYERING AT THE EDGE The 2007 Hofstra Legal Ethics Conference Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday October 14-16, 2007 Roy Simon, Conference Director Confirmed Faculty (to date) Keynote Address: Michael Tigar Raymond Brown James Campbell Angela Davis Eric Freedman Monroe Freedman Leon Friedman Stephen Gillers Glenda Grace Bruce Green Joel Hirschhorn Ronald Kuby Gerald Lefcourt Richard Mauro Kevin McMunigal Daniel Mori Andrew Perlman Burnele… [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:08 am
Professor Stephen Gillers of NYU Law, a co-panelist and recognized ethics expert, explained that with appropriate supervision and disclosure, outsourcing and offshoring are ethically permissible. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:31 pm
" The brief was offered by three bar associations, the Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers, the International Senior Lawyers Project, and two professors specializing in lawyers' professional obligations -- Stephen Gillers of New York University and David Luban of Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 10:31 pm
.” Cohen consulted with Congressional staff and law professor Stephen Gillers and comes up with this list of possible crimes: Misrepresentation to Congress: 18 U.S.C. 1505 Calling Prosecutors: 18 U.S.C. 1512© Witness Tampering: 18 U.S.C. 1512(b) Firing the Attorneys: 18 U.S.C. 1512© More... [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
With the help of NYU Law professor Stephen Gillers and some Congressional staffers, Cohen engages in some issue spotting. “It was not hard to spot that White House and Justice Department officials, and members of Congress, may have violated 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 7:00 am
Stephen Gillers of New York University said several statutes involving obstruction of justice and perjury can be applied to cases in which witnesses allegedly mislead lawmakers. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 6:02 am
Lawprof Stephen Gillers says it's "nonsense," and Ted Olson says "It's making a mountain out of a molehill. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:13 pm
[According to] Stephen Gillers, a professor at New York University Law School... : "The most critical fact is public acceptance, including the litigants," he said. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:41 am
The NYT story ends with Stephen Gillers of NYU: Stephen Gillers, a professor at New York University Law School, saw this as crucial: "The most critical fact is public acceptance, including the litigants," he said. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
"This is prejudicial to the administration of justice," said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University and an authority on legal ethics. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 4:43 pm
"This is prejudicial to the administration of justice," said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University and an authority on legal ethics. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 5:18 pm
Stimson has come under withering criticism from legal ethics experts like Stephen Gillers, who believes that to "have a senior government official suggesting that representing these people somehow compromises American interests . . . is prejudicial to the administration of justice. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 5:59 am
"This is prejudicial to the administration of justice," said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University and an authority on legal ethics. [read post]
18 Aug 2005, 6:20 am
[JURIST] In a Slate article [text] published Wednesday, legal ethicists Stephen Gillers, David Luban and Steven Lubet claim that the White House violated the law when it interviewed Judge John Roberts [JURIST news archive] this spring for the US Supreme Court while he was considering a challenge to US military tribunals in his capacity as a federal appeals court judge. [read post]
