Search for: "Stephen Gillers" Results 141 - 160 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2007, 7:00 am
Stephen Gillers of New York University said several statutes involving obstruction of justice and perjury can be applied to cases in which witnesses allegedly mislead lawmakers. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 3:47 pm
NYU's Stephen Gillers says the "disguised nature of [Beasley Allen's] web site would not allow it to survive challenge under the New York rules" on attorney promotion but doesn't have reason to think it violates the (presumably less stringent) Alabama rules. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:22 am
"Stephen Gillers, who teaches legal ethics at New York University, also puts Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:34 pm
Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor who specializes in legal ethics, told the LAT that Kozinski should recuse himself from the Isaacs case because “the public can reasonably question his objectivity” concerning the issues at hand. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:25 am by Dan Bressler
” “It is quite uncommon, although not always illegal, for lawyers to record other lawyers without their consent, according to Stephen Gillers, an ethics professor at the NYU School of Law. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 3:52 am by SHG
Stephen Gillers, who teaches legal ethics at New York University School of Law, said Kennedy may well have had a legitimate concern about "national security issues. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:26 pm
Stephen Gillers as saying the public could reasonably question Judge Kozinski's objectivity on the subject matter of the trial, now that the contents of Kozinski's personal website are publicly known. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm by Elizabeth Badovinac
“The rules are the same all your professional life,” explained Stephen Gillers, a professor at New York University School of Law in New York City. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Professor Stephen Gillers highlights several in his article How to make Rules for Lawyers, the Professional Responsibility of the Legal Profession[2]. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:15 am by VMaryAbraham
  In a recent post about “Blackberryheads” on the Legal Ethics Forum, renowned legal ethicist Stephen Gillers challenged lawyers by asking, Is it ethical to claim CLE credit for a talk on legal ethics if you’ve spent nearly the entire time a captive of your Blackberry? [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 10:31 pm
.” Cohen consulted with Congressional staff and law professor Stephen Gillers and comes up with this list of possible crimes: Misrepresentation to Congress: 18 U.S.C. 1505 Calling Prosecutors: 18 U.S.C. 1512© Witness Tampering: 18 U.S.C. 1512(b) Firing the Attorneys: 18 U.S.C. 1512© More... [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“What’s different here is that the firms are on a wholesale basis, and dramatically, challenging the behavior of the White House,” said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University and an expert in legal ethics. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:06 pm
"And, of course, Stephen  Gillers says he should recuse himself. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 5:56 am
“It’s not an obvious distinction for layperson to make–this idea that the lawyer is representing you only insofar as you are an official of the company,” said NYU’s Stephen Gillers to AmLaw. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 5:18 pm
Stimson has come under withering criticism from legal ethics experts like Stephen Gillers, who believes that to "have a senior government official suggesting that representing these people somehow compromises American interests . . . is prejudicial to the administration of justice. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
With the help of NYU Law professor Stephen Gillers and some Congressional staffers, Cohen engages in some issue spotting. “It was not hard to spot that White House and Justice Department officials, and members of Congress, may have violated 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:07 pm
Stephen Gillers, a nationally-renowned legal ethics expert, thinks he did, and might face professional discipline. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm by Andrew Perlman
  The summary of the exchange between our own Stephen Gillers and Larry Fox is definitely worth a read for anyone interested in the topic. [read post]