Search for: "Stephen M. Bainbridge" Results 241 - 260 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by Francis Pileggi
Extensive footnote references to “learned commentary and treatises” in the mergers and acquisitions field included: Stephen M. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm by Matt Bodie
One of the most prominent conservative law bloggers who opposed Miers' nomination was Stephen Bainbridge. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 7:09 pm
"I'm not sure if those folks knew how to read those languages," says Ms. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Also I should note that Joe Weisenthal gets it: ... law professor Stephen Bainbridge raises a possibility that it will be the Democrats who torpedo any deal, and create sovereign debt havoc. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:03 am
Joachim PLI Securities Law Practice Center By Kara O’ Brien ProfessorBainbridge.com by Stephen M. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Indeed, John has kindly referred to that card elsewhere: The only sensible argument I've found by someone claiming that insider trading has a victim is made by Stephen Bainbridge, who says that some insider trading is theft of intellectual property of a company. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Regal, But Not Quite Princely: Leo Strine’s Titles are a Mouthful Over on ProfessorBainbridge.com, Stephen Bainbridge notes that former Del. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by Francis Pileggi
If he had room on the slide, I’m certain he would have also referred to Professor Stephen Bainbridge, a corporate law scholar who is often cited in the opinions of the Delaware courts. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Cole (Georgetown), IntLawGrrl guest/alumna Mary Ellen O'Connell (Notre Dame) (left), Stephen I. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm by Francis Pileggi
 Professor Stephen Bainbridge refers to the Chancellor as a prophet of sorts in his insightful post of March 1, 2012, available here. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I’m going to skip over the facts and the case’s convoluted procedural history, as Ann Lipton has a great post on the Chancery Court opinion and an excellent post on the Supreme Court decision. [read post]