Search for: "Stephen P. Halbrook"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
And the Third Circuit has extended it at least to cover Fourth Amendment rights, noting that "[p]ersons who can establish that they are being denied their constitutional rights are entitled to relief, and it can no longer be seriously contended that an action for money damages will serve to adequately remedy unconstitutional searches and seizures. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
[Misdemeanants don’t fall within the “not law-abiding” category.] [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:25 pm
On Oct. 24, Judge John P. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
Despite her hands-on knowledge of historical firearms and her M.A. in history, she "lacks background and training as a historian," has received awards from the Second Amendment Foundation, and "[p]erhaps most importantly … is married to" a man who derives his income from the firearms industry. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:55 pm
On April 28, Judge Stephen P. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
See, e.g., Stephen P. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm
Stephen P. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:23 pm
The Luttig amicus brief is critiqued in a recent VC post by Stephen Halbrook. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
(See my Northwestern article, p. 310.) [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
By happy coincidence, the best book on the legal history of the right has just been published: Stephen P. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
Lytton, associate dean for Research & Faculty Development at Georgia State University College of Law, and attorney Stephen P. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
Lytton, associate dean for Research & Faculty Development at Georgia State University College of Law, and attorney Stephen P. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:41 am
Attorney Stephen P. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:38 am
Attorney Stephen P. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:59 pm
See Stephen P. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:54 pm
., dissenting fromdenial of rehearing en banc).Halbrook, Stephen P., Why Can’t We Be Like France? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:44 am
Stephen P. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:36 pm
Chicago View presentation here In this podcast, Stephen Halbrook and Steve Kanter debate “McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
REV. 1359; Stephen P. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 pm
Among the interesting presenters at the CLE was Stephen Halbrook, discussing his draft article for the Northeastern Law Review symposium, in which he commented on this passage in Chicago’s brief (p. 19, n. 9) in McDonald: incorporation “would raise questions whether a weapon generally in common use for lawful purposes in one locale (such as a high-powered hunting rifle with precision sighting equipment popular in rural Illinois) must be allowed… [read post]
