Search for: "Stephen Pitel" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am by CoL .net
Stephen GA Pitel (Western University) kicked things off with a presentation that was right up my ally: ‘The Extraterritorial Impact of Statutory Jurisdiction Provisions’. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm by Maria Hook
 In particular, Stephen Pitel has argued on this very blog that jurisdiction clauses should be assessed on the balance of probabilities, as opposed to the “good arguable case” standard that is commonly applied (see, in more detail, Stephen Pitel and Jonathan de Vries “The Standard of Proof for Jurisdiction Clauses” (2008) 46 Canadian Business Law Journal 66). [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
. ______________ [1] See Report to Convocation, Professional Regulation Committee, Law Society of Upper Canada (October 25, 2018). [2] Stephen GA Pitel & Will Bortolin, “Revising Canada’s Ethical Rules for Judges Returning to Practice” (2011) 34:2 Dal LJ 483 at 485. [3] See Report to Convocation, Professional Regulation Committee, Law Society of Upper Canada (January 28, 2016). [4] For an analysis of the revisions see Richard Devlin et al, “A Mixed Bag:… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Pronouns are currently a hot topic in the legal profession, following recent measures by Canadian courts to prevent the misgendering of courtroom participants. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In the first of these two Slaw posts, I wrote about the two inquiries into Ontario Court of Justice (“OCJ”) judge Donald McLeod’s alleged misconduct. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
From 12 to 14 September 2019, the Journal of Private International Law held its 8th Conference at the University of Munich, perfectly hosted and organized by our Munich-based colleague Anatol Dutta. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
As Stephen Pitel and Will Bortolin note in their article, “Revising Canada’s Ethical Rules for Judges Returning to Practice”: …[S]o long as the public is of the view that judges have special influence, their appearance in court will raise doubts about the propriety of the outcome. [read post]