Search for: "Stephen Sachs" Results 1 - 20 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
Originalists who are denounced in the essay include Volokh Conspiracy contributors Randy Barnett (Georgetown), Sam Bray (Notre Dame), Stephen Sachs (Duke), Will Baude (Chicago), me (Denver), and frequent VC guest writer Rob Natelson (presently my colleague at the Independence Institute, formerly at Montana). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 2:00 am by mes286
  University of Virginia School of Law –Stephen Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, presents today as part of the Faculty Workshop Series. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Will Baude
Herman Stern Professor of Law Emeritus, Temple University Beasley School of Law Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Beauchamp Brogan Distinguished Professor of Law, The University of Tennessee Adam Scales, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School Stephen Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Jeffrey Aaron Snyder, Associate Professor of Educational Studies, Carleton College Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University Nadine Strossen, John… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Nessim Mezrahi, Stephen Sigrist, and Carolina Doherty review the extent to which plaintiffs’ lawyers generally are relying on short-seller research to try to substantiate fraud-on-the-market claims. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:35 am by James Romoser
Sachs, The Volokh Conspiracy) The post The morning read for Thursday, Jan. 20 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE: It's worth noting that the Boston Globe symposium includes many other proposals for constitutional amendments, including this one by Volokh Conspiracy co-blogger Stephen Sachs, arguing for an amendment giving individual state legislatures more power to initiate constitutional amendments (as opposed to ratify ones proposed by Congress or by a convention of the states). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 8:16 am by Howard Wasserman
Stephen Sachs and I did an episode of the Fed Soc Courthouse Steps podcast on the SB8 cases and what happens next. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:16 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
Pat Smith comments at Ius & Iustitium on my prior post on originalism and positive law, comparing it to Stephen Douglas's studied neutrality on the expansion of slavery. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:06 pm by Ilya Somin
[A delayed, but hopefully still helpful final rejoinder to Stephen Sachs.] [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:18 am by Orin S. Kerr
I was very interested in the posts by Josh Blackman and Stephen Sachs about possible outcomes in Dobbs and what they might say about originalism and/or the conservative legal movement. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 7:47 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
[Would the outcome in Dobbs put originalism in doubt?] [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 2:46 pm by Ilya Somin
In a thoughtful recent post, co-blogger Stephen Sachs responds to my own post arguing that a Supreme Court ruling in favor of Texas' SB 8 anti-abortion law creates greater slippery-slope risks than a ruling against it. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 2:46 pm by Ilya Somin
In a thoughtful recent post, co-blogger Stephen Sachs responds to my own post arguing that a Supreme Court ruling in favor of Texas' SB 8 anti-abortion law creates greater slippery-slope risks than a ruling against it. [read post]