Search for: "Stephen Wermiel" Results 81 - 100 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Stephen Wermiel wrote an explainer for his regular feature, “SCOTUS for law students,” on attempts to predict how a nominee might vote on particular issues and cases in the future. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by Cormac Early
Stephen Wermiel has a new post in this blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” series, on the Court and the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:20 am by admin
Stern’s co-author, Stephen Wermiel, is a Fellow in Law and Government and associate director of the Summer Institute on Law and Government at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:35 am by James Bickford
  Meanwhile, ACSblog interviews Stephen Wermiel, one of the book’s co-authors; he participated in a live chat on this blog last week. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
"  The Carnegie Legal Reporting Program confirms the currently limited access to Brennan's papers as follows:  "What's notable about [Newton's series on Brennan], beyond the actual substance of the reports, is that the revealed papers come from someone other than Stephen Wermiel, Brennan's official biographer. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
  At this blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” feature, Stephen Wermiel discusses the issues in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:00 pm by Dan Ernst
  The seminar will explore both the politics of the Warren Court and the Warren Court’s impact on the politics of the nation.The instructor is Stephen Wermiel, a Fellow in Law and Government at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Adam Gillette
Torvik; speaking of law-related books, I am reading Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion by Seth Stern & Stephen Wermiel. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
” Briefly: At this blog, Stephen Wermiel discusses the tradition and practice of Justices reading their dissents from the bench, as part of his “SCOTUS for law students” series. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
  Last summer this blog held a symposium on the case, which Stephen Wermiel also discussed last week in his column for law students and which was also a recent topic of discussion in the blog’s Community. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” “I think they rather demean the process and give it the appearance of an ordinary ward fight in Chicago,” Brennan confided to his biographer, Stephen Wermiel, in a private conversation in his chambers on October 28, 1987, the details of which has not been revealed until now. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Karen Tani
Another announcement from the Institute for Constitutional History: next semester it will offer two new seminars for advanced graduate students and junior faculty.Equal Justice Under Law: The Enduring Legacy of the Warren Court, 1953-1969, led by Stephen Wermiel (American University Washington College of Law). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
Stephen Wermiel discusses the petitions in Utah Highway Patrol Association v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Lyle previewed the cases for this blog, while Stephen Wermiel of this blog discusses the legal issues in his column for law students. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am by Amy Howe
  And in his column for law students at this blog, Stephen Wermiel looks even further ahead to the oral argument in McCullen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Kali Borkoski
 Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog and reported on the oral argument; Steve Wermiel also discussed the case in his “SCOTUS for Law Students” column. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:44 am by Amy Howe
As Stephen Wermiel explained nearly three years ago, original-jurisdiction cases are lawsuits – usually, although not always, between two states – filed directly in the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am by Conor McEvily
In this blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” column, Stephen Wermiel discusses Justice O’Connor’s recent remarks expressing doubts about the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Bush v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Holder, the immigration case in which the Justices will hear oral arguments today. moment hosted a symposium to discuss the influence of religion on the Justices; contributors include Robert Barnes, Dahlia Lithwick, Tony Mauro, Sarah Posner, Stephen Wermiel, Leslie Griffin, Marshall Breger, Emily Bazelon, and this blog’s Lyle Denniston. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Allison Trzop
In his “SCOTUS for law students” feature for this blog, Stephen Wermiel looks at Salinas v. [read post]