Search for: "Stephen v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 5,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Derek T. Muller
Washington—and the per curiam opinion in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
And the Court issued a per curiam ruling in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  The complaint comes from Stephen Elliott, a widely published author and director who was upset about his inclusion in a spreadsheet that circulated in the wake of allegations against Harvey Weinstein. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Tuesday's decision by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall in Elliott v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:07 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Consent to search On September 20, 2018, two officers of the Howard County Police Department, Stephen Vinias and John Beamer, observed several individuals, including Appellant, Shabazz Watkins, enter a red Dodge Charger in the parking lot of a Red Roof Inn on Route 1 in Jessup, Maryland. ... [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, concurred in the judgment. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In a concurring opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, agreed with the outcome but attempted to cabin the decision’s reach and justify it on narrower grounds. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:13 am by CMS
In this case comment, Caitlin Heard, Frances Denney and Robert Stephen, who all work within the intellectual property team at CMS, comment on the judgment handed down by the Supreme Court in June 2020 in the matter of Regeneron v Kymab [2020] UKSC 27, which concerns whether patents were invalid for insufficiency. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am by Grant Sullivan
The court was unconvinced by Montana’s argument under Locke v. [read post]