Search for: "Stephens v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003: “The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt’s essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
This year’s problem was written by USD Moot Court Executive Board member Matthew Stephens. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kim Colby
Discriminatory treatment compared to similar secular conduct: Just three years after Smith, in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:14 am
Or at any rate, here's Bartleby :THOMAS JEFFERSON, letter to William Stephens Smith, November 13, 1787. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm by Emily
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Alison Frankel, Bankruptcy, Biglaw, Brian Smith, Brobeck Phleger & Harrison, Bunsow De Mory Smith Allison LLP, Bunsow v. [read post]