Search for: "Stephens v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Carr v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am
Additional Resources: If you’re terminally ill, you still must wait for Social Security benefits, September 10, 2015, Cleveland.com, by Stephen Koff More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
The new Social Security Trustees Report has just been released. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:12 am
A report on Sander’s plan by Social Security’s chief actuary, Stephen C. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
Daniel Ortiz, representing the petitioner, Richard Culbertson, an attorney who successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court, argued in favor of a separate cap. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, they were well aware of the implications the decision holds for the administrative state. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
[Eric's introductory note: this guest blog post comes from my colleague Stephen Diamond. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
Most of the federal ALJs sit on Social Security Administration cases (over 1,650 out of 1,926), for which it is much less likely that appointments clause objections were preserved, but given the number of cases they have, even a relative few will be bad news for the agency. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA) provides in pertinent part:In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word "spouse" refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife.DOMA is a pretty nasty law, depriving same-sex… [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:13 pm
Alejandro v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
The Social Security Administration outlines Evidentiary Requirements for SSDI claimants. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
For example, the administration must rescind Trump-era rules that weakened protections for beneficiaries of government-funded social services by eliminating requirements that religious providers refer individuals who ask for a secular alternative and notify individuals of their rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Although a Social Security regulation has long provided that “[t]he dismissal of a request for Appeals Council review is binding and is not subject to further review,” the Social Security Administration, represented by Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston, agreed with Kimberly that the dismissal was a final decision subject to review but disagreed on one point. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Stephen Rademaker explored whether there are fast-track routes that would enable the Biden administration to rejoin the Open Skies Treaty, an arms control agreement with Russia. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
