Search for: "Sterling v. Weinstein"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 2, 2022 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of November 25-December 1, 2022 Lessons from the Chancery Court Decision in P3 Health Group Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven J. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 2, 2022 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of November 25-December 1, 2022 Lessons from the Chancery Court Decision in P3 Health Group Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven J. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:06 am
, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Say on climate, Shareholder voting Important Earnout/Milestone Drafting Points Arising from Recent Pacira and Shire Decisions Posted by Gail Weinstein, Brian T. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 1:12 am
Then, as now, he concealed the defendant's name (calling the case "US v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 795 P.2d 915, 931 (Kan. 1990) (“compliance with FDA rules and regulations creates only a rebuttable presumption that the warnings are adequate”); MacDonald v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:05 pm
The case, Graham v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:28 am
Weinstein, New York, for appellant. [read post]