Search for: "Steve Bainbridge"
Results 161 - 180
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 8:18 pm
Steve Bainbridge responds to my post about insider trading as compensation with a suggestion that rules against insider trading are an example of a case “where mandatory rules are appropriate. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:08 am
And later: One must distinguish, it seems, between social conservatives whose scholarship is largely unrelated to their political and moral views (Professor Bainbridge may be such a case), and those whose political and moral views are manifest in their scholarship. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:19 am
I, of course, cite Steve Bainbridge (who posts to similar effect). [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:44 am
Steve Bainbridge considers whether investors are harmed by insider trading. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:00 am
Nonetheless, they obtained a non-Delaware judge's view of Delaware law (something Steve Bainbridge thinks Judge Posner got wrong). [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
" Now, the company is, in the words of Steve Bainbridge, throwing Sokol under the bus. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Steve Bainbridge has a good discussion, with a link to the... [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
The commentary so far has been filled with accolades (see the comments by Francis Pileggi and Steve Bainbridge) and they are deserved. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:19 am
Steve Bradford comments on my post addressing the lawsuit against former Berkshire-Hathaway agent David Sokol: Steve Bainbridge .. explains why Sokol's trading could be taking a corporate opportunity and violate Sokol's duty of loyalty. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:48 am
Steve Bainbridge discusses a Delaware chancery suit by a Berkshire-Hathaway shareholder against former B-H executive David Sokol for profits he earned by buying Lubrizol stock ahead of his former employer. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:38 pm
(Ilya Somin) Dogs Against Romney is back for the 2012 campaign, and has established a website and twitter page (HT: Steve Bainbridge). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 pm
Thanks and a hat tip to nationally respected Chicago lawyer Steve Jakubowski for sending this opinion to me. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
And I wonder what Professor Bainbridge, the corporate-law-should-protect-boards theorist, thinks about it. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:33 am
Steve Bainbridge has written an article supporting this prohibition with some modifications. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:35 am
Bainbridge and Pileggi don’t like it. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:25 am
Update: OK, OK, Martha Stewart wasn't indicted for insider trading, as Christine and Steve Bainbridge have kindly reminded me, but for obstruction of justice. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Professor Bainbridge has just opened his copy, and in the mean time has assembled some of the favorable reviews and summaries of Schools for Misrule that other leading bloggers have already printed. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:46 am
The following scholars are also contributing chapters: Bobby Ahdieh (Emory), Steve Bainbridge (UCLA), Margaret Blair (Vandy), Rob Daines (Stanford), Steve Davidoff (Ohio State), Jill Fisch (Penn), Tamar Frankel (BU), Ron Gilson (Stanford/Columbia), Jeff Gordon (Columbia), Sean Griffith (Fordham), Don Langevoort (GT), Ian Lee (Toronto), Richard Painter (Minnesota), Frank Partnoy (SD), Gordon Smith (BYU), Randall Thomas (Vandy), and Bob Thompson (GT). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 pm
Steve Bainbridge, always faster at the keyboard than me, has a post about the controversy here. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:06 am
Steve Bainbridge argues that veil piercing should be eliminated. [read post]
