Search for: "Steve Lubet"
Results 41 - 60
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
" Quoted are Steve Lubet and Steve Gillers. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 11:47 pm
In the comments to my unscientific political poll of blog readers below, Steve Lubet made a very interesting point. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:27 pm
The Boss's candid discussion of his history of depression is the subject of an interesting article by my brother, Alex Lubet. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:14 pm
His explanations of the difference suggest that Chaffetz doesn't even understand why Congress has the power to investigate in the first place.My colleague Steve Lubet and I elaborate at CNN.com, here. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
Following up on my previous posts: Samuel Moyn (Yale), Law Schools Are Bad For Democracy (Dec. 18, 2018) Steve Lubet (Northwestern) & Margaret Raymond (Dean, Wisconsin), Most Law Schools Are Good For Democracy (Dec. 21, 2018) John O. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:42 pm
One award recipient was the surviving staff of Charlie Hebdo, a decision that triggered some controversy, as Steve Lubet has discussed. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:56 pm
Faculty lounge blogger Steve Lubet's essay, "Reconstructing Atticus Finch," in the Michigan Law Review back in 1999 was part of the movement to question Atticus' ideas when he was seen as a heroic figure by so many. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 7:28 am
Prominent legal ethicist Steve Lubet argues — and I agree — that this “dangerously misguided” complaint would set a terrible precedent if it somehow succeeded. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:05 pm
[Abby Mims, New York Times “Modern Love”; Steve Lubet, Legal Ethics Forum; Debra Cassens Weiss, ABA Journal] Tags: divorce, lawyers “Writer’s ‘awful’ prenup experience actually shows value of lawyers, law prof says” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
On my prior post about the expired Garland nomination and the Scalia vacancy, my former professor Steve Lubet questioned why a Garland recess appointment would have created a vacancy on the D.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:12 pm
Steve Lubet at Faculty Lounge links to a 2015 essay calling the "Le Marseillaise" scene from Casablana the greatest in movie history and the turning point in the film. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 3:21 pm
My former teacher Steve Lubet at Faculty Lounge does a weekly post featuring different versions of a particular song. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Steve Lubet (Faculty Lounge) hits the glaring defect in their argument--they minimize the severity of Rose's misdeeds and their effects on the game by emphasizing that Rose never bet against the Reds, without acknowledging the downstream effects of his gambling choices. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
Steve Lubet kindly sent me his new book entitled "Lawyers' Poker: 52 Lessons that Lawyers Can Learn from Card Players", after we had a lively exchange about the: a) the value of slow play at poker, and; b) what trial advocacy lessons can be learned from a sophisticated analysis of poker play. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:24 am
Many thanks to Steve Lubet for inviting us to write about our new essay, “The Right to Unmarry: A Proposal,” which we posted to SSRN on April 2. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:48 pm
” The owners of the factory were prosecuted for the fire but won an acquittal, “thanks to the exceptionally effective representation of legendary attorney Max Steuer” (Steve Lubet). [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
ABA Formal Ethics Opinion No. 95-391, to which Steve Lubet refers in his posts, focuses on what a former judge may do upon return to the practice of law. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:15 am
In addition to Steve Lubet's new book, which David McGowan referenced below, you should also take a look at the new AALS PR newsletter, which The Legal Profession blog has posted on its site. [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:16 am
I’m pleased to be joining in the conversation as a guest blogger over the next few weeks, thanks to a kind invitation from Steve Lubet. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:31 pm
They are also an unlikely subject for a debate on judicial etiquette, which is how I read both the story and the comments on it from John and (here and on Volokh) Steve Gillers and (Volokh only) Steve Lubet (scroll down on Volokh). [read post]
