Search for: "Steve Sady" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Everyone should check out this post by Steve Sady, Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender, Portland, OR, on the 9th Cir. blog. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:37 pm
A commentor here and FPD Steve Sady have effectively pointed out that I was quite wrong to suggest that today's SCOTUS decision in Lopez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 5:25 am
Steve Sady of the Oregon FPD has made available the latest version of his article, "Developments in Federal Search and Seizure Law" (click here for a link to the PDF version). [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:41 pm
Over at the Ninth Circuit Blog, Steve Sady has this terrific post discussing the history and recent developments surrounding the federal rules governing so-called compassionate release. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:05 pm
Over at the Ninth Circuit Blog, Steve Sady has this interesting post about reasonable doubt and Rita. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 6:47 am
Check out the Ninth Circuit's blog by Portland Oregon Federal Defender Steve Sady addressing what he calls the Presumption of Reasonableness Virus (PRV) that has infected this and several other circuits. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:00 am
Our colleague Steve Sady of the Federal Public Defender Office in Oregon has prepared another extremely useful resource, this time discussing BOP issues affecting our clients before and after sentencing. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:15 pm
Gonzales, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times discusses the decision here, and Steve Sady, the Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender in Portland, Oregon, discusses it here at the Ninth Circuit Blog. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 3:49 pm by Jon Sands
Congrats to Elizabeth Daly and Steve Sady, Ore FPD (Portland). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 5:58 pm
  But, as Steve Sady highlights in this recent post, the Supreme Court continues to deny cert on many issues that seek to follow-up on Blakely's promise to champion "adversarial testing" over "judicial inquisition" at sentencing. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:42 pm by Jon Sands
  Thus, under the categorical approach, it is not a force predicate.Congrats to Elizabeth Daily and Steve Sady of the Oregon FPD for its amicus brief.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/06/26/14-30168.pdf [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:48 am
Steve Sady of the Ninth Circuit Blog has some interesting thoughts on issues in need of US Supreme Court Attention. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 11:23 am by Steve Sady
Steve Sady, Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:36 pm
Feb. 20, 2008), decision available here.Players: Another victory for tireless inmate rights advocate, Chief Deputy Defender Steve Sady, Portland Oregon. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:31 am by Ken White
The threat — made through Scaramucci's counsel, Sam Lieberman of Sadis & Goldberg LLP — is every bit as blustery and frivolous as the players and circumstances would suggest. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
The Court heard evidence from Shobna Gulati, Robert Ashworth, Lauren Alcorn, Steve McFadden, Shane Roche, Paul Gascoigne, Lucy Taggart, Dan Evans, Sadie Frost and James Hipwell. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:32 am by Jon Sands
Therefore, we hold that Subsection (iv) is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the First Amendment.Congrats to Steve Sady and Lisa Ma of the FPD Oregon (Portland) and Carmen Smarandoiu of the FPD Cal N FPD (SF) for their amicus work on behalf of the FPD of the 9th Circuit. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:54 pm by Steve Sady
Steve Sady, Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 10:34 am by Jon Sands
  Furthermore, carrying over this four-month period would not result in a windfall to the defendant; the reduction was awarded for reasons unrelated to the drug quantity (the basis for the Amendment 782 sentence reduction).Judge McKeown did not believe that Drake's reasoning applied, and that the "term of imprisonment" mentioned in § 3582(c)(2) and § 1B1.10 did not account for the adjustment awarded because BOP would not award presentence incarceration credit.Kudos to… [read post]