Search for: "Steve Sady" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2017, 9:09 pm by Steve Kalar
Admirable win for R&W Attorney Elizabeth Daily and Chief Deputy FPD Steve Sady, District of Oregon FPD. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am by Steve Kalar
Flores-Cordero shows Descampsin action – for a great primer on this great Supreme Court decision, visit Steve Sady’s helpful Q&A on Descampshere . [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:53 pm by Jon Sands
  He would not have gone further and found a due process violation.Congrats to Steve Sady and Elizabeth Daily of the FPD Oregon (Portland) office.The decision is here:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/05/25/14-16399.pdfSmith v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:16 am by INFORRM
  The next witnesses will be Shobna Gulati, Steve McFadden, Lauren Alcorn, Sadie Frost, Ben Jackson, Shane Roche and James Hipwell. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
For Further Reading: By happy coincidence, our fellow blogger Steve Sady has just finished his magnum opus "The Sentencing Commission, The Bureau of Prisons, And The Need For Full Implementation Of Existing Ameliorative Statutes To Address Unwarranted And Unauthorized Over-Incarceration. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:23 am
Steve Sady, Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
"UPDATE:  Steve Sady now has this long post on this topic at the Ninth Circuit Blog. [read post]
 Phillip contacted his lawyer, Ruben Iniguez, and Ruben and Steve Sady filed a motion with the court, contending that BOP was putting itself in the position of the judge, not filing the motion unless it thought the motion should be granted. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:58 am
Thus, it violated the APA.Congratulations to AFPD Steve Sady of D. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
Yes, the defendants' sentences were still affirmed, but the jurisdiction to examine pleas and waivers was vindicated.AFPD Steve Sady of the Oregon FPD filed an excellent amicus brief on behalf of the Ninth Circuit federal public and community defenders on this important point. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:45 am
Thomas, Steve "the Energizer Bunny" Sady won a habeas where the BOP gave no rationale explanation for excluding his client from its drug treatment program. 2009 WL 2591680 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 pm by Steve Kalar
She concedes, however, real ambiguity in the term – and our guru and fellow blogger Steve Sady has taught us that ambiguity means the Rule of Lenity. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
The court will, today, hear evidence from Ms Alcorn, Mr Roche and Steve McFadden. [read post]