Search for: "Steve Sanders"
Results 181 - 200
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
Legal scholar Steve Sanders has argued that states must recognize out-of-state marriages even if there is no specific congressional legislation requiring them to do so. [read post]
“Fight in the Streets”: Democratic Leader Hakeen Jeffries Triggers Renewed Debate Over Rage Rhetoric
1 Feb 2025, 4:23 am
Bernie Sanders (I, Vt.) confronted Robert F. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The don’t-usually-shows are expected to be heavily in favor of Trump on the Republican side and Sanders on the Democratic side. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 6:58 am
“I think lobbying is changing,” said lobbyist Steve Elmendorf. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
Yesterday at the colloquium, Steve Bank of UCLA Law School (a former Chicago student of mine, way back in the day) presented a tax history paper concerning an interesting episode in modern U.S. tax law: the failed effort by the Kennedy Administration, as part of what became the 1962 tax act, to enact withholding for people’s dividend and interest income, in response to substantial under-reporting (especially for dividends). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:43 am
Steve Peers @StevePeers invokes a Star Trek: The Original Series reference for a job for Nigel Farage, who has stepped down as the leader of the United Kingdom Independent Party.Steve Peers @StevePeers 6h6 hours agoAny of the jobs done by any of those guys in red shirts #suggestajobforFarageOh, feel the burn (not Sanders, or Switzerland, which is not a member state of the EU).David Allen Green @David Allen Green quotes both Arthur Conan Doyle and Samuel Becket… [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 8:50 pm
Sanders more reimbursement from the insurance companies than everything else she’d done all morning, combined. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:11 am
That is what is ultimately at stake here.THIRD UPDATE: I heartily recommend this commentary by appellate litigator and University of Chicago adjunct professor Steve Sanders. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:00 am
Timothy Mast (Troutman Sanders LLP), Pamela S. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 1:09 pm
Air Force serviceman Steve Sanders, has not submitted a post-trial affidavit altering his account. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:06 pm
Steve Sanders [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:47 pm
James Rosenfeld Sally Perez Sanford Greenberg Sara Gordon Scott Bauries Scott Greenfield Seth Fortin Shari Lynn Allison Sharon Byers Sheri Johnson Sherri Keene Stacy Caplow Stanley Fisher Steve Berenson Steven Richardson Steven Zeidman Sudha Setty Susan Donovan Susan Fortney Susan Mandiberg Susan Rozelle Susan Trimble Sylvia Royce Talitha Bailey Tanya Cooper Taylor Flynn Taylor Sampson Thomas Guernsey Thomas Schweitzer Thomas Staunton Tigran Eldred Tina Foster Tom McDonnell Tony Dillof… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
Commentary and analysis of Friday’s order come from Richard Socarides of The New Yorker, Ilya Shapiro at Forbes, Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice, Steve Sanders at ACSblog, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Brianne Gorod and Judith Schaeffer at The New Republic, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Arthur Leonard at his eponymous blog. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:57 am
I owe an ever lasting debt to those colleagues -- thank you to Bill Klein, Devon Carbado, Steve Bainbridge, Rick Sander and more. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm
O’Malley declines to seat elected Baltimore Orphans’ Court judge - by Steve Lash Maryland Gov. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:18 pm
Steve Sanders [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
Briefly: At Casetext, Shaakirrah Sanders considers how the ‘constitutional implications of President Donald J. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:06 am
Sanders, Jr. and Katie Fowler Monoc, William S. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:01 pm
Paul Jones and Latosha Sanders purchased a new home from the builders, Centex Homes in 2004. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am
” More critical commentary comes from Steve Sanders, who at The Huffington Post contends that “apologists” for Ginsburg “are picking a dangerous fight”; William Ross, who at JURIST argues that, although “Ginsburg’s remarks probably did no serious harm to the Court’s prestige, they should serve as a warning to justices to be more discreet in their public pronouncements, particularly in unguarded and unrehearsed interviews”; John… [read post]
