Search for: "Steve Shiffrin" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Norton’s important book culminates a long tradition of worrying about government speech, a tradition going back at least as far as Steve Shiffrin’s and Mark Yudof’s scholarship of almost forty years ago.[23] But whether it be Shiffrin and Yudof’s slightly hedged calls for more constitutional (and judicial scrutiny) of government speech then, or Norton’s even more nuanced… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:27 pm
 * I have borrowed and modified the language of the first five of the seven values listed by Steve Shiffrin in Chapter 4 of his book, The Religious Left and Church-State Relations (Princeton University Press, 2009): 41. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 Here is how I put it in a joint statement with my colleague Steve Shiffrin for a Cornell University press release (speaking for ourselves rather than for the university, of course):Today's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, my colleague and friend Steve Shiffrin argues (at pp 120-22 of his book What's Wrong With the First Amendment?) [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Martin Redish (Northwestern), Steve Shiffrin (Cornell), and I filed an amicus brief supporting this result; many thanks to Daniel Schmutter, who was our invaluable pro bono local counsel (and who has helped me in many cases in the past, in New Jersey and New York). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Martin Redish (Northwestern), Steve Shiffrin (Cornell), and I filed an amicus brief supporting this result; many thanks to Daniel Schmutter, who was our invaluable pro bono local counsel (and who has helped me in many cases in the past, in New Jersey and New York). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Running throughout her numerous columns on free speech (archived here) one finds a focus on what my colleague Steve Shiffrin has argued ought to be the central concern of free speech doctrine: dissent. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
(I am grateful to my colleague Steve Shiffrin for a version of this point.)I am left somewhere in between Berlin's pluralism and Dworkin's conception of "equal liberty. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
For example, if you plan on writing about the intersection of first amendment law and non-discrimination statutes (the topic of this term's Masterpiece Cakeshop case), you'd best set aside substantial time on the various amicus briefs submitted by, among many others, constitutional law Hall of Famers Doug Laycock, Eugene Volokh, Ira Lupu, Steve Shriffin (with Seana Shiffrin and Mike Dorf), and Michael McConnell, advocating numerous different perspectives on the… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
— submitted an amicus brief in the case on behalf of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and leading First Amendment scholars Martin Redish (Northwestern) and Steve Shiffrin (Cornell). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
I am persuaded by my colleague Steve Shiffrin that the most fundamental aspect of freedom of speech should be protection for the right to dissent. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:30 am
 They might find support in something like the approach advocated by my colleague Steve Shiffrin in What's Wrong With the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
North Dakota, in which the Court held that the Constitution allows warrantless breath tests – but not warrantless blood tests – of suspected drunk drivers, comes from Steve Shiffrin at Religious Left Law. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Steve Shiffrin’s response: kids today are thinking about nothing but materialism; these aren’t the values we should instill. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:00 am
 My colleague Steve Shiffrin suggests that the effort to induce settlement in Zubik might not be a product of a 4-4 split.I'm inclined to agree normatively but not causally. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 2:42 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
I wish all those involved (especially and in particular, Steve Shiffrin) the best in that and other endeavors. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
 To paraphrase my colleague Steve Shiffrin, students enter law school as naive formalists and leave as legal realists.Now obviously that doesn't apply to everyone. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 11:07 am
Steve King), that they amount to an outright “refusal to enforce our current immigration laws” (Rep. [read post]