Search for: "Steve Shiffrin" Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2010, 8:57 am
By Mike Dorf A new blog, Religiousleftlaw.com, has just been launched by three of my Cornell colleagues--Steve Shiffrin, Eduardo Penalver, and DoL contributor Bob Hockett--along with sometime DoL commenter Patrick O'Donnell and prominent con law scholar Michael Perry. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm
Here is how I put it in a joint statement with my colleague Steve Shiffrin for a Cornell University press release (speaking for ourselves rather than for the university, of course): Today's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 8:10 am by Andrew Plumb-Larrick
Deference and Its Differential Impact on First Amendment Rights in the Roberts Court with commentary by Professor Mark Tushnet (Harvard) and Professor Steve Shiffrin (Cornell). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Paul Horwitz
The list was incredible, comprising many of the most prominent American law and religion scholars (Doug Laycock, Kent Greenawalt, Steve Smith, Steve Shiffrin, Marci Hamilton, Chris Eisgruber, etc., etc.), many more junior but very prominent figures in the field (Adam Samaha, Caroline Mala Corbin, Jessie Hill, Marc DeGirolami, etc., etc.), and some very prominent folks who have written less regularly about law and religion but are helping to shape current debates in the… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:30 am
 They might find support in something like the approach advocated by my colleague Steve Shiffrin in What's Wrong With the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
For example, if you plan on writing about the intersection of first amendment law and non-discrimination statutes (the topic of this term's Masterpiece Cakeshop case), you'd best set aside substantial time on the various amicus briefs submitted by, among many others, constitutional law Hall of Famers Doug Laycock, Eugene Volokh, Ira Lupu, Steve Shriffin (with Seana Shiffrin and Mike Dorf), and Michael McConnell, advocating numerous different perspectives on the… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
., the two main contributors to this blog were successful parliamentary debaters, while such noted legal academics as NYU President John Sexton and my colleague Steve Shiffrin were once very successful on-topic debate coaches, and my own mentor, Larry Tribe, was a champion on-topic debater. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
 To paraphrase my colleague Steve Shiffrin, students enter law school as naive formalists and leave as legal realists.Now obviously that doesn't apply to everyone. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, my colleague and friend Steve Shiffrin argues (at pp 120-22 of his book What's Wrong With the First Amendment?) [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Martin Redish (Northwestern), Steve Shiffrin (Cornell), and I filed an amicus brief supporting this result; many thanks to Daniel Schmutter, who was our invaluable pro bono local counsel (and who has helped me in many cases in the past, in New Jersey and New York). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:06 pm
  As the column notes, my colleague Steve Shiffrin and I filed an amicus brief in the case, urging the court to rule as it did--so I am pleased with the outcome. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Martin Redish (Northwestern), Steve Shiffrin (Cornell), and I filed an amicus brief supporting this result; many thanks to Daniel Schmutter, who was our invaluable pro bono local counsel (and who has helped me in many cases in the past, in New Jersey and New York). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:34 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
*[I'm grateful to Steve Shiffrin for suggestions for this compilation.] [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:51 pm
  As Steve Davidoff reported, Vice-Chancellor Lamb ruled in an 89-page opinion that there had been no MAC and ordered Hexion to show up at the closing. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:33 pm
What all of this may show is that the distinction between content-based and content-neutral regulations of speech is simply too blunt to capture the real stakes in many free speech cases--a point that my colleague Steve Shiffrin has made for some time. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:27 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
One exception to the generalization (which readily comes to mind after Steve Shiffrin’s recent post) I think is worthy of deep consideration is that of the leading members of the Weatherman (later, ‘Weather Underground’) that evolved out of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in the late 1960s. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
North Dakota, in which the Court held that the Constitution allows warrantless breath tests – but not warrantless blood tests – of suspected drunk drivers, comes from Steve Shiffrin at Religious Left Law. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
*The thesis claims, in particular, “that the normal way to establish that a person has authority over another person involves showing that the alleged subject is likely better to comply with reasons which apply to him (other than the alleged authoritative directives) if he accepts the directives as authoritatively binding and tries to follow them, rather than by trying to follow the reasons which apply to him directly.”Update: At ReligiousLeftLaw.com, my beloved co-blogger Steve… [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:07 am by Paul Horwitz
(Steve Shiffrin raises similar questions at MoJ.)   [read post]