Search for: "Steve Shiffrin" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Norton’s important book culminates a long tradition of worrying about government speech, a tradition going back at least as far as Steve Shiffrin’s and Mark Yudof’s scholarship of almost forty years ago.[23] But whether it be Shiffrin and Yudof’s slightly hedged calls for more constitutional (and judicial scrutiny) of government speech then, or Norton’s even more nuanced… [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:57 am
By Mike Dorf A new blog, Religiousleftlaw.com, has just been launched by three of my Cornell colleagues--Steve Shiffrin, Eduardo Penalver, and DoL contributor Bob Hockett--along with sometime DoL commenter Patrick O'Donnell and prominent con law scholar Michael Perry. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Paul Horwitz
 The list was incredible, comprising many of the most prominent American law and religion scholars (Doug Laycock, Kent Greenawalt, Steve Smith, Steve Shiffrin, Marci Hamilton, Chris Eisgruber, etc., etc.), many more junior but very prominent figures in the field (Adam Samaha, Caroline Mala Corbin, Jessie Hill, Marc DeGirolami, etc., etc.), and some very prominent folks who have written less regularly about law and religion but are helping to shape current debates in… [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Martin Redish (Northwestern), Steve Shiffrin (Cornell), and I filed an amicus brief supporting this result; many thanks to Daniel Schmutter, who was our invaluable pro bono local counsel (and who has helped me in many cases in the past, in New Jersey and New York). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Martin Redish (Northwestern), Steve Shiffrin (Cornell), and I filed an amicus brief supporting this result; many thanks to Daniel Schmutter, who was our invaluable pro bono local counsel (and who has helped me in many cases in the past, in New Jersey and New York). [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
North Dakota, in which the Court held that the Constitution allows warrantless breath tests – but not warrantless blood tests – of suspected drunk drivers, comes from Steve Shiffrin at Religious Left Law. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
”Update: At ReligiousLeftLaw.com, my beloved co-blogger Steve Shiffrin disagrees with Waldron's conception of the dignity and respect due legislation qua legislation, claiming it is “politically unreasonable,” that it is implicated in the promotion of political quiescence or somehow discourages dissent. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm
  Here is how I put it in a joint statement with my colleague Steve Shiffrin for a Cornell University press release (speaking for ourselves rather than for the university, of course): Today's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:33 pm
What all of this may show is that the distinction between content-based and content-neutral regulations of speech is simply too blunt to capture the real stakes in many free speech cases--a point that my colleague Steve Shiffrin has made for some time. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:51 pm
  As Steve Davidoff reported, Vice-Chancellor Lamb ruled in an 89-page opinion that there had been no MAC and ordered Hexion to show up at the closing. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:27 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” One exception to the generalization (which readily comes to mind after Steve Shiffrin’s recent post) I think is worthy of deep consideration is that of the leading members of the Weatherman (later, ‘Weather Underground’) that evolved out of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in the late 1960s. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 2:03 pm
It has then sought to direct these against progressive Democratic political figures (many of whom happen to be quite religiously committed, as our colleague Steve Shiffrin, on whose new book Mike has been posting this week, can attest). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:34 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
*[I'm grateful to Steve Shiffrin for suggestions for this compilation.] [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:07 am by Paul Horwitz
 (Steve Shiffrin raises similar questions at MoJ.) [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm by Marty Lederman
”And in a comment to Mike Dorf’s post, Mike's colleague Steve Shiffrin offers some examples of the sort of thing he, Mike and Zach are worried about:  What if President Reagan had gone ahead with his suggestion of not prosecuting those who do not pay their capital gains taxes? [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
— submitted an amicus brief in the case on behalf of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and leading First Amendment scholars Martin Redish (Northwestern) and Steve Shiffrin (Cornell). [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Robert Corn-Revere
" In the same vein, Cornell University Law Professor Emeritus Steve Shiffrin bitterly asks "what's wrong with the First Amendment? [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Robert Corn-Revere
" In the same vein, Cornell University Law Professor Emeritus Steve Shiffrin bitterly asks "what's wrong with the First Amendment? [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  I am also pleased to report that the subtle and wise arguments of the majority were informed by expert analysis in an amicus brief submitted by two of my colleagues, Cornell Professors Steve Shiffrin and Michael Dorf. [read post]