Search for: "Steve Vladeck" Results 101 - 120 of 933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 2:40 pm
Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc in al Bahlul": Steve Vladeck has this post at "Just Security" about an order granting rehearing en banc that the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:57 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This short essay is an exchange with Professor Steve Vladeck's about my Article entitled: Boumediene, Munaf, and the Supreme Court’s Misreading of the Insular Cases, 97 Iowa Law Review 101 (2011). [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:26 am by Benjamin Wittes
Steve Vladeck makes a few important points in response to my post on the habeas scorecard. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:08 am by Benjamin Wittes
Habeas lawyer David Remes, who represents Guantanano detainees, writes in with the following comment on the Guantanamo hunger strikes, and Steve’s, my and the Taliban’s response to them: Several days ago, Steve Vladeck noted the release of a letter by the Center for Constitutional Rights and individual habeas attorneys calling attention to the mass hunger strike by detainees at Guantanamo and deploring developments there that… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
It was an unusually good discussion, featuring Orin Kerr, Steve Vladeck and me. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:50 am by Howard Wasserman
Contributors include former GuestPrawfs Scott Dodson, Tung Yin, and Hillel Levin, as well as PermaPrawfs Steve Vladeck and myself. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:33 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller Steve testified yesterday about WikiLeaks in front of the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Howard Wasserman
Steve Vladeck is quoted in this Slate article arguing that the district may abstain on Younger/equitable grounds. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:50 am by Robert Chesney
Still no music, but Steve Vladeck and I have posted Episode 2 of our new National Security Law Podcast, “If You Thought That Last Executive Order Was Controversial…” In it, we discuss President Trump’s new Executive Order on immigration, last weekend’s use of military force in Yemen, and . . . our predictions for the Super Bowl and President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court (we recorded yesterday afternoon; Steve's… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:17 pm by Robert Chesney
As Ben notes below, Steve Vladeck objects to the Circuit’s recent ruling in Hatim insofar as that decision suggests that the Circuit has held that detention may be predicated on provision of material support to an AUMF-covered group, as opposed to predicating it on membership in such a group.  [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 5:37 am
Steve Vladeck and I are thrilled and grateful to the University of Miami School of Law for hosting us. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:37 am by Kevin Jon Heller
If he’s right, our next Supreme Court Justice will likely be the woman who recently argued this (h/t: my friend Steve Vladeck): [W]ith regard to the material support statute, there are substantial (pending) issues with regard to its scope, given that the Ninth Circuit invalidated the “service,” “training,” and “expert advice or assistance” provisions on vagueness grounds.  [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 5:24 am by Wells Bennett
 He’ll be joined by Dechert’s Steve Bradbury, and our own Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:33 am
In this Response, I will explain why Professor Vladeck's prediction will also not come to pass It's not clear to me that Hibbitts is totally wrong, even if Steve may be--I'll let Steve answer Anthony directly. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:02 pm by Howard Bashman
And at the “Just Security” blog, Steve Vladeck has a post titled “What the Heck is Happening in Al-Nashiri? [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:54 am by Robert Chesney
I wanted to draw attention to a special episode of the National Security Law Podcast, which Steve Vladeck and I just recorded in response to President Trump's statement that it might be best to send Saipov (the terrorist who killed in NYC yesterday) to Guantanamo, his criticism of civilian criminal prosecution, and Senator Graham's suggestion that Saipov should be interrogated without counsel. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:49 am by Dan Markel
For fed courts, I knew I could easily ask our in house guru, Steve Vladeck, to lead off a post and it will be up soon. [read post]