Search for: "Steve Vladeck" Results 161 - 180 of 929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 8:40 pm by Robert Chesney
In response to this post Ben and I put up earlier regarding the Graham bill’s detention provision, Steve Vladeck has written a reply and given me permission to post it below.  [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:28 pm by Eugene Kontorovich
My written testimony — and that of fellow witnesses Steve Groves and Stephen Vladeck — is available here. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:54 pm by Andrew Hamm
.: Steve Vladeck analyzed today’s opinion in Manrique v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Steve has a post at Lawfare discussing the problems with the court's analysis over whether it was clearly established that the mistreatment Padilla suffered was torture or "merely" cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment (see also Jonathan Hafetz on the subject). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
This program was started at American University back in 2008 by PermaPrawf Steve Vladeck and has become an annual event in the Fed Courts scholarly community. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 3:14 pm by Glenn Reynolds
First, the panelists include the “usual suspects” of progressive activism, including UC Berkeley Erwin Chemerinsky, Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet (discussed here), and UT’s own Steve Vladeck. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 10:13 pm
  (Montreal was lovely and SEALS--where I get to share a panel with Prawfs-blogger Steve Vladeck among others--is almost around the corner [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:57 pm by Robert Chesney
In a post on the American Constitution Society’s blog, Steve Vladeck takes aim at section 1031 of the Senate version of the NDAA FY ’12, which concerns detention authority under the 9/18/01 AUMF.  [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:30 am by Steve Vladeck
by Steve Vladeck Just two days ago, in his dissent in Douglas v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:19 pm by Guest Blogger
Steve VladeckMuch has been written about Justice Kennedy’s 2003 opinion for the majority in Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Steve Vladeck has this blog’s preview. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 6:20 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Over at Prawfs, Steve Vladeck has an extended response to my recent post, The Strange Case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law.  [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law.  [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:52 am by Benjamin Wittes
I largely agree with Steve Vladeck’s excellent post on Judge Richard Posner’s decision yesterday in Daoud and Judge Ilana Rovner’s concurrence in that decision. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the amicus brief that he filed on behalf of former officials of the Department of Health and Human Services in Armstrong v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 am by Eric Muller
This tweet from Steve Vladeck brought to my attention that last Friday, the Defense Department submitted a brief to a military commission favorably citing and extensively quoting Hirabayashi v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:12 am by First Mondays
Because of Ian’s son’s early arrival, UT Law Professor Steve Vladeck stepped up to the plate to join Dan as a guest host. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody M. Poplin
On this week’s Lawfare Podcast, Managing Editor Wells Bennett invited Steve Vladeck of both Lawfare and Just Security, and Adam Thurschwell, an attorney with the Office of the Chief Defense Counsel of the Military Commissions, into the Lawfare studio to discuss the D.C. [read post]