Search for: "Steven Calabresi"
Results 81 - 100
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2018, 5:42 am
Steven G. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 3:42 pm
Balkin has a post titled "Steven Calabresi dreams of judges-- and more judges-- and even more judges! [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:34 am
Steven G. [read post]
16 May 2014, 9:12 am
Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Jeff Rosen, Steven Calabresi, and I got together to discuss Brown's legacy at the Constitution Center on Wednesday evening: http://youtu.be/KALrU_ObB_0By the way, I'm busily working up my Reply to the very thoughtful critiques of the Balkinization Symposiasts, and I hope to have something postable next week. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:36 pm
Calabresi and Justin R. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
Dearborn and, Desmond King: Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and The Unitary Executive (Oxford University Press, 2021).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Anya Bernstein (Buffalo), Steven Calabresi (Northwestern), Blake Emerson (UCLA), Stephen Griffin (Tulane), Paul Gowder (Northwestern), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Daphna Renan (Harvard), Cristina Rodriguez (Yale), and myself.At the conclusion, the authors will respond to the… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:05 pm
" Law Professor Steven G. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 10:05 am
In this episode of SCOTUScast, Dean John Eastman of Chapman University School of Law offers his analysis on the recent decision in response to Professor Steven Calabresi's analysis in another episode of SCOTUScast. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:27 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Federalist Society’s Faculty Division recently hosted a debate on the constitutionality of the individual mandate between Randy Barnett and myself, moderated by Northwestern lawprof Steven Calabresi. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Oh, NOW You Have A Problem: With historic numbers of judges confirmed, Steven Calabresi doesn't need Trump anymore. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:55 pm
I know that many people have already seen this (it's a bit old), but I thought I'd comment on this op-ed by Professor Steven Calabresi. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:48 am
Calabresi has an op-ed that begins, "Today the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:47 am
Steven G. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:09 pm
Steven Calabresi can't believe readers will take this Wall Street Journal opinion piece seriously ... can he? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:39 am
Here is the abstract: In Originalism and Sex Discrimination, Steven Calabresi and Julia Rickert make an unconventional claim—that the Fourteenth Amendment, as it was originally understood, prevents the government from enforcing laws that discriminate on the basis of sex. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:48 am
But I suspect they probably don't see things the way I do.In any case, Calabresi and McGinnis somewhat exaggerate the dangers of new Democratic appointments: Given the most likely retirements, the most plausible scenario is that a Democratic President will be able to ensure that Ginsburg, Stevens (and possibly Souter) are replaced by liberals, thus preserving the status quo. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 5:33 am
There is an opinion piece in today’s Wall Street Journal where Steven Calabresi, who teaches law at Northwestern University, and Michael Saks, who teaches law at Arizona State University, argue that criminal juries of less than 12 people are unconstitutional and should be rejected. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:29 pm
Dorf, Cornell; Steven Calabresi, Northwestern; Douglas Kmiec, Pepperdine; John C. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
” Law professor Steven G. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen Steven Gow Calabresi Michael W. [read post]
