Search for: "Stevens v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
However, for only “average” well-known marks”, the threshold of necessary closeness depends on how well-known the trademark is, on the similarity of the marks, and on the type of injury. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Horvath, Julien Bourgeois and Mark D. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Horvath, Julien Bourgeois and Mark D. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
In this Article, I suggest that both conclusions miss the mark. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
Washington DC. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
Steven G. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Popovic, Steven E. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
The Duty to Respond to Public Comments In Perez v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
(Adolfsen),Steven Lewbel, Esq. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:10 pm
Emma Svoboda provided context for the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Mark Haight 51. [read post]
