Search for: "Steward Machine Co. v. Davis" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog has been publishing in recent weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of the law. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Larry Tribe Guest
The constitutionality of the Social Security System (see Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
Cardozo’s majority opinions in Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
Hence no matter what the courts say, the states are really being coerced into accepting federal regulation, which, critics of modern spending clause doctrine would contend, violates the Tenth Amendment.Upholding the Social Security Act in Steward Machine Co. v Davis in 1937, Justice Cardozo agreed that there might be some point at which "pressure turns into compulsion," but lacking definitive proof of such coercion, conditional federal spending… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Dole Court traced the idea to a 1937 decision, Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
The coercion argument can be traced initially to a comment the Supreme Court made in a 1937 decision, Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(It said: "Our decisions have recognized that in some circumstances the financial inducement offered by Congress might be so coercive as to pass the point at which 'pressure turns into compulsion.' Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]