Search for: "Stewart Baker"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 5:27 pm
[Episode 448 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] This episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast kicks off with the sudden emergence of a serious bipartisan effort to impose new national security regulations on what companies can be part of the U.S. information technology and content supply chain. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
Stewart Baker argued that the FBI’s reliance on press reporting in support of FISA surveillance applications during a period of press overreach on Trump-Russia issues contributed to a credibility problem for the Bureau. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:40 am
[How Press Bias Fed FISA Abuse in the Trump-Russia Panic] I've finished the second in what I hope will be a series of posts exploring the risk of partisan abuse of U.S. intelligence authorities. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:06 am
[Episode 447 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] Our last episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast (No. 446) was a long interview on the U.S. national cybersecurity strategy with Chris Inglis, until recently the national cybersecurity director. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 8:48 am
[Episode 446 of the Cyberlaw Podcast.] [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:04 am
[Episode 445 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] As promised, the Cyberlaw Podcast devoted half of this episode to an autopsy of Gonzalez v Google LLC , the Supreme Court's first opportunity in a quarter century to construe section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:55 am
America, Henry Baker, Marjorie Stewart Joyner (top), Cornell Conaway, Tope Mitchell, James West (bottom)In the 1880s, second assistant patent examiner Henry E. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 6:01 am
[Interviewing Bruce Schneier in episode 444 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] This bonus episode offers an interview of Bruce Schneier, the prolific security guru, about his latest book, A Hacker's Mind: How the Powerful Bend Society's Rules, and How to Bend Them Back. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm
[Episode 443 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] This episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast opens with a look at some genuinely weird AI behavior, first by the Bing AI chatbot – dark fantasies, professions of love, and lies on top of lies – and then by Google's AI search bot. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm
[Episode 442 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] The latest episode of The Cyberlaw Podcast gets a bit carried away with the China spy balloon saga. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
[Episode 441 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] This episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast is dominated by stories about possible cybersecurity regulation. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:40 pm
[Episode 440 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] The big cyberlaw story of the week is the Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit against Google and the many hats the company wears in the online ad ecosystem. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:01 pm
Stewart Baker argued that Gen. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumSandy Levinson I have been teaching courses on American constitutional law for almost 50 years. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
[Episode 439 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] We kick off a jam-packed episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast by flagging the news that ransomware revenue fell substantially in 2022. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:02 pm
[The Jan. 6 Committee uncovers a different kind of official norm-breaking ] The Jan. 6 committee exposed norm-breaking in surprising places. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
And Stewart Baker sat down with Andy Greenberg to discuss his book “Tracers in the Dark: The Global Hunt for the Crime Lords of Cryptocurrency. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:12 am
[Episode 438 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] In this bonus episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, I interview Andy Greenberg, long-time WIRED reporter, about his new book, Tracers in the Dark: The Global Hunt for the Crime Lords of Cryptocurrency. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 9:32 am
(Baker and Ellis have contributed to the debate, arguing that renewal should be the occasion for legislating against the partisan misuse of intelligence authorities.) [read post]
