Search for: "Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am by PaulKostro
Fane, 70 N.J. 528 (1976), that all property owners abutting a sidewalk were immune from liability, was partially overruled in Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 149 (1981). [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:17 pm by PaulKostro
Div. 2002) (citing Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 153 (1981)), aff’d o.b., 175 N.J. 449 (2003). [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:05 am by PaulKostro
An exception was later “carved out” for commercial landowners in Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 149-50 (1981). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 7:07 am by PaulKostro
Thereafter, in Stewart v. 104 Wallace St, Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 149 (1981), the Supreme Court revised that principle and held that commercial landowners could be liable for injuries sustained on sidewalks adjacent to their properties. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
See Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146 (1981). [read post]