Search for: "Stewart v. Duncan" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 2:03 pm by Dave Hoffman
On tap today in civil procedure: the dispiriting Walker case, in which Justice Stewart holds that the collateral bar rule trumps the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:56 am by Kate Fort
The other judges, from the left side of the bench around to the right were: Oldham Duncan Willett Higginson Haynes Elrod Stewart Smith Owen Jones Wiener Dennis Southwick Graves Jr. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Duncan Getchell Jr., solicitor general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, for the respondents. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
, Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart LLP, Birmingham, Ala. 14 $124,546,733 Motor Vehicle Pacheco v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Duncan Hollis, Opinio Juris; earlier on Bond v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 10:15 pm by Josh Blackman
The case was heard before seventeen members of the en banc court: Elrod, Davis, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Richman, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, and Douglas. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 12:53 pm by Josh Blackman
In the en banc poll, five judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and twelve judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Elrod and Judges Stewart, Richman, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the Hewitt en banc majority had a heterodox makeup: Ho, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Judge Ho wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Judges Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Twelve members (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reverse on lenity grounds. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. [read post]